Comparisons / Miradorly
ilumd vs Miradorly
Miradorly is the competitor most like ilumd, and this page says so plainly. Both connect to a private GitHub or GitLab repo, render the Markdown as a portal, let clients sign in with email instead of a GitHub account, and filter every read by role so each client sees only what they were given. The difference is what happens after the docs are on screen. Miradorly is read-only by design. ilumd turns a reader's suggestion into a pull request against your repo, tells you when a doc has gone stale or the code beside it has moved, and gives each client a portal in your branding.
Credit where it’s due
Miradorly is a clean, focused take on the problem: connect the repo, choose the folders, invite clients, done. Threaded section comments with a central inbox and a role-aware MCP server for AI agents are both things ilumd does not have today. If a read-only portal with comments is the whole job, it does that job well.
Where ilumd is different
Where Miradorly stops, and ilumd keeps going.
Edits flow back to the repo
Miradorly is read-only by design. In ilumd, anyone with access can suggest an edit and it opens a pull request against your repo — your normal review decides what merges.
You know when a doc has gone stale
Live sync shows the latest commit; it doesn't say whether the doc is still right. ilumd rates each doc's freshness from its last edit and last human check, and flags it when code changes beside it.
A portal per client, in your branding
Miradorly scopes clients to projects inside one portal. ilumd gives each client workspace its own branded portal — the self-serve front door an agency hands over at project close.
Every doc, across every client, searchable
ilumd discovers every Markdown file across every connected repo and searches them all — scoped to what the asker may see — so how you solved it for the last client is a search away.
Writes into the tools your teams already use
ilumd pushes governed docs and change requests into Notion, Confluence, Jira, and Linear. Miradorly's integrations are the repo connection and its MCP server.
Side by side
ilumd vs Miradorly, feature by feature.
| Capability | Miradorly | ilumd |
|---|---|---|
| Reads private GitHub / GitLab Markdown | Yes | Yes |
| Clients sign in without a GitHub account | Yes | Yes |
| Per-client isolation on every read | Yes | Yes |
| Edits go back to the repo as pull requests | Read-only by design | Yes |
| Freshness rating + code-change flag | No | Yes |
| Branded portal per client | Projects in one portal | Yes |
| Section comments with an inbox | Yes | Request-an-update only |
| MCP server for AI agents | Yes | No |
| Governed ask-your-docs Q&A | Via MCP, bring your own agent | Built in |
| Pricing model | $29/mo for 10 projects · $79/mo unlimited | $29 per workspace · readers free |
This reflects how each tool is meant to be used, as of today. Miradorlyis good at what it’s built for; ilumd solves a different problem over the same docs.
Reach for Miradorly when…
You want a read-only window onto your repo docs with comments and an MCP endpoint, you run many small projects, and a flat $79 a month for unlimited projects suits you better than a price per workspace. Miradorly is a good, honest fit for that.
Reach for ilumd when…
Your clients should be able to ask for changes that land as pull requests, you need to know which docs have gone stale, each client deserves a portal in your branding, and you'd rather have clients billed for their own workspace than absorb a flat fee.
ilumd vs Miradorly · FAQ
Common questions.
Is ilumd a Miradorly alternative?
Yes, and it's the closest comparison on this site. Both render private repo Markdown as a role-scoped client portal. ilumd adds edits back to the repo as pull requests, freshness and code-change signals, a branded portal per client, and write-back into Jira, Linear, Notion, and Confluence.
Which is cheaper?
It depends on how many audiences you serve. Miradorly is $29 a month for up to 10 projects and 50 external collaborators, or $79 for unlimited. ilumd is $29 per workspace with unlimited readers; an agency can bill each client for their own workspace, and the first paying client covers the agency's own. For many clients on one flat bill, Miradorly's list price is lower. For client-billed portals with editing and freshness, ilumd is.
Can clients edit docs in ilumd?
They can suggest edits, and ilumd opens a pull request against your repo. Nothing changes until your normal review merges it. Miradorly is read-only by design.
Does ilumd have comments or an MCP server?
Not today. ilumd has a request-an-update flow that becomes a tracked change request, and a built-in ask-your-docs Q&A that only answers from what the asker may see. Section comments and an MCP endpoint are Miradorly features ilumd doesn't match yet.
Do both keep the repo as the source of truth?
Yes. Neither tool moves your docs. The difference is direction: Miradorly reads from the repo; ilumd reads from it and writes back to it through pull requests.